antibody against runx2 Search Results


95
Bioss primary antibodies against runx2
Primary Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX1+%2B+RUNX2+Polyclonal+Antibody/pm42108471-64-0-6
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibodies against runx2
Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2+Antibody/pmc08316728-172-23-19
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology runx2
Figure 9. Photomicrographs of the maxillary sinus region of rabbits 40 days after filling with HA + β-TCP in the “paste and granule” configurations and concomitant implant installation, showing immunolabeling of <t>RUNX2,</t> VEGF, OCN, and TRAP proteins. The black arrows indicate examples of immunolabeling.
Runx2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/VEGF/pm37232771-148-11-21
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against runx family transcription factor 2 runx2
Primers used in the qRT‐PCR.
Antibodies Against Runx Family Transcription Factor 2 Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc08727956-115-12-25
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx family transcription factor 2 runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech antibody against runx2
( a ) Immunofluorescence images of <t>Runx2</t> in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels during osteogenic differentiation. ( b ) Number of Runx2-positive cells in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels. *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.
Antibody Against Runx2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2+Fusion+Protein/pmc12938435-97-13-18
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MBL International runx2 antibody 8g5
( a ) Immunofluorescence images of <t>Runx2</t> in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels during osteogenic differentiation. ( b ) Number of Runx2-positive cells in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels. *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.
Runx2 Antibody 8g5, supplied by MBL International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/anti+runx2/pmc03403236-187-12-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 antibody 8g5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Novus Biologicals antibodies against runt related transcription factor 2
( a ) Immunofluorescence images of <t>Runx2</t> in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels during osteogenic differentiation. ( b ) Number of Runx2-positive cells in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels. *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.
Antibodies Against Runt Related Transcription Factor 2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/Osteocalcin+Antibody+(2D4)/pm35310387-96-7-14
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runt related transcription factor 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology antibodies against runx2
Immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenesis-related proteins in IBD rabbit models. ( A ) Representative immunohistochemical staining images showing <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN expression in bone tissues of IBD rabbit models after scaffold implantation at 12 weeks post-surgery. ( B and C ) Quantification of RUNX2-positive and OCN-positive cells in each group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA group; ### p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA/VAN group.
Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2+Rabbit+pAb/pmc12103859-147-18-23
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals anti runx2
Immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenesis-related proteins in IBD rabbit models. ( A ) Representative immunohistochemical staining images showing <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN expression in bone tissues of IBD rabbit models after scaffold implantation at 12 weeks post-surgery. ( B and C ) Quantification of RUNX2-positive and OCN-positive cells in each group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA group; ### p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA/VAN group.
Anti Runx2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2%2FCBFA1+Antibody/pmc10529414-137-35-39
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies against runx2
Osteogenesis‐associated long noncoding RNA (lncRNA‐OG) promotes the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs). (A): Left: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on day 7 (upper panel), alizarin red (ARS) staining on day 14 after osteogenic induction (lower panel). Right: ALP activity was determined as units per gram of protein per 15 minutes. ARS staining was quantified as the absorbance at 562 nm. (B): Relative mRNA levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and ALP detected by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) on day 7 of osteogenic differentiation. Relative mRNA levels of OSX and OCN detected by qRT‐PCR on day 10 of osteogenic differentiation. Data were normalized to GAPDH expression. (C): Western blotting analysis of RUNX2 protein levels on day 7 of osteogenic induction. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). Lower, quantification of band intensities (lower panel). (D): H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical staining of OCN in lncRNA‐OG and NC groups. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *, p < .05; **, p < .01 ( n = 3 independent experiments). See also Supporting Information Figure .
Primary Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/RUNX2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc07379496-97-0-5
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc rabbit polyclonal antibody against runx2
Osteogenesis‐associated long noncoding RNA (lncRNA‐OG) promotes the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs). (A): Left: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on day 7 (upper panel), alizarin red (ARS) staining on day 14 after osteogenic induction (lower panel). Right: ALP activity was determined as units per gram of protein per 15 minutes. ARS staining was quantified as the absorbance at 562 nm. (B): Relative mRNA levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and ALP detected by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) on day 7 of osteogenic differentiation. Relative mRNA levels of OSX and OCN detected by qRT‐PCR on day 10 of osteogenic differentiation. Data were normalized to GAPDH expression. (C): Western blotting analysis of RUNX2 protein levels on day 7 of osteogenic induction. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). Lower, quantification of band intensities (lower panel). (D): H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical staining of OCN in lncRNA‐OG and NC groups. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *, p < .05; **, p < .01 ( n = 3 independent experiments). See also Supporting Information Figure .
Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody Against Runx2, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+runx2/Rabbit+Polyclonal+Anti-JAK2+(phospho+Y1007)+antibody/pm29436627-50-7-14
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal antibody against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 9. Photomicrographs of the maxillary sinus region of rabbits 40 days after filling with HA + β-TCP in the “paste and granule” configurations and concomitant implant installation, showing immunolabeling of RUNX2, VEGF, OCN, and TRAP proteins. The black arrows indicate examples of immunolabeling.

Journal: Dentistry journal

Article Title: Evaluation of Two Configurations of Hydroxyapatite and Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate in Sinus Grafts with Simultaneous Implant Installation: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.

doi: 10.3390/dj11050121

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 9. Photomicrographs of the maxillary sinus region of rabbits 40 days after filling with HA + β-TCP in the “paste and granule” configurations and concomitant implant installation, showing immunolabeling of RUNX2, VEGF, OCN, and TRAP proteins. The black arrows indicate examples of immunolabeling.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were polyclonal antibodies, produced in goats, against RUNX2 (SC8566), VEGF (SC1881), OCN (SC18319) and TRAP (SC 30832) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Techniques: Immunolabeling

Primers used in the qRT‐PCR.

Journal: FEBS Open Bio

Article Title: In vitro evaluation of periapical lesion‐derived stem cells for dental pulp tissue engineering

doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13336

Figure Lengend Snippet: Primers used in the qRT‐PCR.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% non‐fat milk and incubated with primary antibodies against RUNX family transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) (dilution 1 : 500; #12556S; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) (dilution 1 : 500; sc‐73632, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) (dilution 1 : 500; ab103203; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Sp7 transcription factor (SP7) (dilution 1 : 1000; PA5‐115697; Thermo Fisher), VEGF (dilution 1 : 100; MA5‐13182; Thermo Fisher), GDNF (dilution 1 : 200; 711074; Thermo Fisher) and GAPDH (WB0197; Biotechwell) and were then incubated with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (dilution 1 : 5000; Biotechwell).

Techniques: Sequencing

Comparison of the osteo/odontogenic capacities of the cells. (A) ALP staining after osteo/odontogenic induction for 3 and 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) Alizarin red staining showing the presence of calcified nodules after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of osteo/odontogenic induction. Scale bar = 500 μm. (C) Gene expression patterns of ALP , RUNX2 and DSPP after osteogenic induction for 3 and 7 days; the expression level was normalized to that of ACTB ( n = 3, Student’s t ‐test). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. (D) Western blotting detection (upper) and imagej analysis (below) of DSPP, DMP1, RUNX2 and SP7 after osteogenic induction for 7, 14 and 21 days. Data are shown as the mean ± SD.

Journal: FEBS Open Bio

Article Title: In vitro evaluation of periapical lesion‐derived stem cells for dental pulp tissue engineering

doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13336

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of the osteo/odontogenic capacities of the cells. (A) ALP staining after osteo/odontogenic induction for 3 and 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) Alizarin red staining showing the presence of calcified nodules after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of osteo/odontogenic induction. Scale bar = 500 μm. (C) Gene expression patterns of ALP , RUNX2 and DSPP after osteogenic induction for 3 and 7 days; the expression level was normalized to that of ACTB ( n = 3, Student’s t ‐test). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. (D) Western blotting detection (upper) and imagej analysis (below) of DSPP, DMP1, RUNX2 and SP7 after osteogenic induction for 7, 14 and 21 days. Data are shown as the mean ± SD.

Article Snippet: The membranes were blocked with 5% non‐fat milk and incubated with primary antibodies against RUNX family transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) (dilution 1 : 500; #12556S; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) (dilution 1 : 500; sc‐73632, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) (dilution 1 : 500; ab103203; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Sp7 transcription factor (SP7) (dilution 1 : 1000; PA5‐115697; Thermo Fisher), VEGF (dilution 1 : 100; MA5‐13182; Thermo Fisher), GDNF (dilution 1 : 200; 711074; Thermo Fisher) and GAPDH (WB0197; Biotechwell) and were then incubated with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (dilution 1 : 5000; Biotechwell).

Techniques: Comparison, Staining, Gene Expression, Expressing, Western Blot

( a ) Immunofluorescence images of Runx2 in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels during osteogenic differentiation. ( b ) Number of Runx2-positive cells in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels. *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Bioengineering

Article Title: An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering

doi: 10.3390/bioengineering13020139

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunofluorescence images of Runx2 in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels during osteogenic differentiation. ( b ) Number of Runx2-positive cells in BMSCs co-cultured with hydrogels. *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: The fixed samples were permeabilized and blocked, followed by incubation with a primary antibody against Runx2 (Shanghai, China, Proteintech, 20700-1-AP) and then with the corresponding fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (USA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011).

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Cell Culture

( a – d ) qPCR analysis of OCN , COL-1 , Runx2 and Osterix in BMSCs on Day 7 and 14. * p < 0.05; **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Bioengineering

Article Title: An Injectable, Osteoconductive Gelatin-Enabled GelMA/HAp Hydrogel Scaffold for Minimally Invasive Bone Tissue Engineering

doi: 10.3390/bioengineering13020139

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a – d ) qPCR analysis of OCN , COL-1 , Runx2 and Osterix in BMSCs on Day 7 and 14. * p < 0.05; **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: The fixed samples were permeabilized and blocked, followed by incubation with a primary antibody against Runx2 (Shanghai, China, Proteintech, 20700-1-AP) and then with the corresponding fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (USA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011).

Techniques:

Immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenesis-related proteins in IBD rabbit models. ( A ) Representative immunohistochemical staining images showing RUNX2 and OCN expression in bone tissues of IBD rabbit models after scaffold implantation at 12 weeks post-surgery. ( B and C ) Quantification of RUNX2-positive and OCN-positive cells in each group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA group; ### p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA/VAN group.

Journal: International Journal of Nanomedicine

Article Title: Anti-Infection Efficacy, Osteogenesis Potential, and Biocompatibility of 3D Printed PLGA/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Porous Scaffolds Grafted with Vancomycin/DOPA/rhBMP-2 in Infected Rabbit Bone Defects

doi: 10.2147/IJN.S514978

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenesis-related proteins in IBD rabbit models. ( A ) Representative immunohistochemical staining images showing RUNX2 and OCN expression in bone tissues of IBD rabbit models after scaffold implantation at 12 weeks post-surgery. ( B and C ) Quantification of RUNX2-positive and OCN-positive cells in each group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA group; ### p < 0.001 versus the PLGA/n-HA/VAN group.

Article Snippet: After 1 h of non-specific binding blockage with 10% goat serum, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies against RUNX2 (#A2851; 1:100; ABclonal, Wuhan, China) and OCN (#HZK-11654; 1:100; Huzhen, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C overnight and washed three times with PBS.

Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Expressing

Osteogenesis‐associated long noncoding RNA (lncRNA‐OG) promotes the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs). (A): Left: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on day 7 (upper panel), alizarin red (ARS) staining on day 14 after osteogenic induction (lower panel). Right: ALP activity was determined as units per gram of protein per 15 minutes. ARS staining was quantified as the absorbance at 562 nm. (B): Relative mRNA levels of RUNX2 and ALP detected by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) on day 7 of osteogenic differentiation. Relative mRNA levels of OSX and OCN detected by qRT‐PCR on day 10 of osteogenic differentiation. Data were normalized to GAPDH expression. (C): Western blotting analysis of RUNX2 protein levels on day 7 of osteogenic induction. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). Lower, quantification of band intensities (lower panel). (D): H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical staining of OCN in lncRNA‐OG and NC groups. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *, p < .05; **, p < .01 ( n = 3 independent experiments). See also Supporting Information Figure .

Journal: Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio)

Article Title: LncRNA‐OG Promotes the Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Under the Regulation of hnRNPK

doi: 10.1002/stem.2937

Figure Lengend Snippet: Osteogenesis‐associated long noncoding RNA (lncRNA‐OG) promotes the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs). (A): Left: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on day 7 (upper panel), alizarin red (ARS) staining on day 14 after osteogenic induction (lower panel). Right: ALP activity was determined as units per gram of protein per 15 minutes. ARS staining was quantified as the absorbance at 562 nm. (B): Relative mRNA levels of RUNX2 and ALP detected by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) on day 7 of osteogenic differentiation. Relative mRNA levels of OSX and OCN detected by qRT‐PCR on day 10 of osteogenic differentiation. Data were normalized to GAPDH expression. (C): Western blotting analysis of RUNX2 protein levels on day 7 of osteogenic induction. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). Lower, quantification of band intensities (lower panel). (D): H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical staining of OCN in lncRNA‐OG and NC groups. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *, p < .05; **, p < .01 ( n = 3 independent experiments). See also Supporting Information Figure .

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RUNX2 (8486; Cell Signaling Technology [CST], Danvers, MA), total β‐catenin (8480; CST), active β‐catenin (19807; CST), ERK1/2 (4695; CST), phospho‐ERK1/2 (4370; CST), hnRNPK (ab39975; Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.), smad1 (6944; CST), phospho‐smad1/5/8 (13820; CST), BMP2 (ab14933; Abcam), BMP4 (ab124715; Abcam), BMP6 (ab155963; Abcam), BMP7 (ab129156; Abcam), BMP9 (ab207318; Abcam), β‐actin (3700; CST), and GAPDH (ab8245; Abcam) were diluted 1:1,000 and incubated with the membranes at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Staining, Activity Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Immunohistochemical staining